An international team of researchers, including scientists from Wits University, have substantially increased the age at which we can trace the emergence of modern culture, all thanks to the San people of Africa.
The research by the team, consisting of scientists from South Africa, France, Italy, Norway, the USA and Britain, was published in two articles online in the prestigious journal, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” last week.
The paper, titled: “Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artefacts from Border Cave, South Africa” was authored by Francesco d'Errico, Lucinda Backwell, Paola Villa, Ilaria Degano, Jeannette Lucejko, Marion Bamford, Thomas Higham, Maria Perla Colombini, and Peter Beaumont.
Doctor Backwell is a senior researcher in palaeoanthropology, and Professor Bamford a palaeobotanist at the Bernard Price Institute for Paleontological Research at Wits University.
“The dating and analysis of archaeological material, discovered at Border Cave in South Africa, has allowed us to demonstrate that many elements of material culture that characterise the lifestyle of San hunter-gatherers in southern Africa, were part of the culture and technology of the inhabitants of this site 44 000 years ago,” says Backwell.
A key question in human evolution is when in prehistory human cultures similar to ours emerged. Until now, most archaeologists believed that the oldest traces of San hunter-gatherer culture in southern Africa dates back 10 000, or at most 20 000 years.
The international team of researchers, led by Francesco d'Errico, Director of Research at the French National Research Centre, dated and directly analysed objects from archaeological layers at Border Cave.
Located in the foothills of the Lebombo Mountains in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the site has yielded exceptionally well-preserved organic material.
Backwell says their results have shown without a doubt that at around 44 000 years ago, the people at Border Cave were using digging sticks weighted with perforated stones, like those traditionally used by the San.
“They adorned themselves with ostrich egg and marine shell beads, and notched bones for notational purposes. They fashioned fine bone points for use as awls and poisoned arrowheads. One point is decorated with a spiral groove filled with red ochre, which closely parallels similar marks that San make to identify their arrowheads when hunting,” says Backwell.
Chemical analysis of residues on a wooden stick decorated with incisions reveals that, like San objects used for the same purpose, it was used to hold and carry a poison containing ricinoleic acid found in castor beans. This represents the earliest evidence for the use of poison.
A lump of beeswax, mixed with the resin of toxic Euphorbia, and possibly egg, was wrapped in vegetal fibres made from the inner bark of a woody plant. “This complex compound used for hafting arrowheads or tools, directly dated to 40 000 years ago, is the oldest known evidence of the use of beeswax,” says Backwell.
Warthog tusks were shaped into awls and possibly spear heads. The use of small pieces of stone to arm hunting weapons is confirmed by the discovery of resin residue still adhering to some of the tools, which chemical analysis has identified as a suberin (waxy substance) produced from the sap of Podocarpus (yellowwood) trees.
The study of stone tools discovered in the same archaeological layers as the organic remains, and from older deposits, shows a gradual evolution in stone tool technology. Organic artefacts, unambiguously reminiscent of San material culture, appear relatively abruptly, highlighting an apparent mismatch in rates of cultural change. This finding supports the view that what we perceive today as “modern behaviour” is the result of non-linear trajectories that may be better understood when documented at a regional scale.
Another paper, titled: “Border Cave and the Beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa” will also be published today. The authors are Paola Villa, Sylvain Soriano, Tsenka Tsanova, Ilaria Degano, Thomas Higham, Francesco d'Errico, Lucinda Backwell, Jeannette J. Luceiko, Maria Perla Colombini and Peter Beaumont.
Doctor Lucinda Backwell, (MSc) (PhD) (Witwatersrand and Bordeaux): Palaeoanthropologist
Backwell's research interest focuses on the evolution of hominin cultural behaviour and cognition, prehistoric bone tool technology, ethnoarchaeology amongst Kalahari Bushmen hunter-gatherers, origins of ritual mortuary practices. Lucinda gives introductory courses on human evolution and taphonomy to geology, zoology and Honours students, and supervises postgraduates on various topics, mostly relating to the taphonomy of fossil assemblages from caves in the Cradle of Humankind.
Professor Marion K Bamford, (PhD): Research Officer and Deputy Director of the BPI at Wits
Bamford's research interests have included the Permian Glossopteris flora, the Lower Cretaceous flora from the Kirkwood Formation in the Eastern Cape Province, and the Middle Cretaceous angiosperm flora from Orapa in Botswana. Her main emphasis now is on fossil woods from southern Africa, including its taxonomy, palaeoecology and dating. Fossil wood from the Karoo deposits (Permian and Triassic) is being studied in order to establish a biostratigraphic scheme. Cretaceous and Tertiary woods are studied for dating, palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography. She has also studied fossil woods from a Pliocene hominid cave deposit, Sterkfontein, for palaeoclimatic interpretations. She gives classes to Geology and Botany students on palaeobotany, as part of the general Palaeontology courses.
For images, background material or video clips and interviews, contact:
Prof Marion Bamford (note to journalists: she is currently in East Africa)
Prof Francesco d'Errico
(+33) 5 40 00 26 28
(+33) 6 04 15 54 54